10/30/2022 0 Comments Strain theory and serial killers![]() ![]() Some have found very few or no significant gender differences in the strain-crime process ( Agnew & Brezina, 1997 Hoffman & Cerbonne, 1999 Hoffman & Su, 1997 Mazerolle, 1998). ![]() In the past ten years, a number of researchers have sought to test Broidy and Angew’s (1997) ideas (either explicitly or implicitly) with mixed results. They further note that GST makes theoretical arguments similar to feminist accounts of female offending ( Chesney-Lind, 1989) by including a focus on how victimization and oppression may impact deviant behaviors. Broidy and Agnew (1997) proposed that GST’s theoretical processes were broad enough that the theory could help explain the gender gap in crime and provide an explanation of female crime through a focus on the types of strain, emotional responses, and conditioning factors that affect males and females in the contexts of their lives. In 1997, Broidy and Agnew laid out various hypotheses about how GST could be used to address two issues in gender and crime: the gender gap in crime such that males are over-represented for most criminal behaviors (the gender ratio problem) and the explanation of female crime with a mainstream theory (the generalizability problem) ( Daly & Chesney-Lind, 1988, pp. That coping is more likely to be criminal when the strains are severe, seen as unjust, and are linked with anger ( Agnew, 2001). Agnew (1992) argues that various negative relations with others (strain or stress) lead to negative emotions and encourage some type of coping. Over the last fifteen years, general strain theory (GST) has developed into one of the leading social psychological theories of crime with a fairly developed body of research ( Agnew, 1992, 2001, 2006a). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |